|
Teaching Literature | 
 enlarge | Author: Elaine Showalter
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Category: Book
List Price: $26.95
Buy New: $19.99
You Save: $6.96 (26%)
New (29) Used (19) from $17.41
Avg. Customer Rating:  8 reviews
Sales Rank: 88635
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 176
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 6 x 0.6
ISBN: 0631226249
Dewey Decimal Number: 807.11
EAN: 9780631226246
ASIN: 0631226249
Publication Date: January 7, 2003
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand new Book, ALL days Low Price !
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Teaching Literature is an inspirational guidebook for all teachers of English and American literature in higher education.
- Written by leading academic, prolific author and cultural journalist, Elaine Showalter.
- Original and provocative reflections on teaching literature in higher education.
- Encourages teachers to make their classroom practice intellectually exciting.
- Wide-ranging - covers the practical, theoretical, and methodological aspects of teaching literature.
- Highly practical - employs real examples from real classes and careers throughout.
- Draws on 40 years of international teaching experience.
Book Description
Drawing on 40 years of international teaching experience, Elaine Showalter inspires instructors of English and American Literature to make their classroom practice as intellectually exciting as their research. Examples from real classes and careers are cited throughout, generating an unusual degree of authenticity and immediacy.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
Practical...usually May 13, 2007
Okay, if you're going to be teaching at Harvard or Yale, Showalter's advice is perfect. For those of us outside of the ivy league, she still offers great advice and insight in an easy to read format with abundant references for the novice teacher. Her introduction on anxiety will give any teacher pause to reflect.
 Amazing Amazon February 6, 2007
1 out of 6 found this review helpful
The book was NEW. The cost was few. And I got it in a day or two!
Textbook for teaching January 3, 2007
I read this book as part of assigned reading for a 'Teaching Practicum' class in my English PhD Program. It was a good, helpful read (even though she has some kind of chip on her shoulder about Yale). We supplemented Showalter with other more theoretical and more anecdotal accounts of teaching literature. I would recommend this book if you're a beginning teacher and would like to accrue some vicarious teaching experience, and think a little more critically and constructively about what you do in the classroom and why.
commentary on the "disadvantaged-lot" guy June 3, 2006
0 out of 13 found this review helpful
He says he has 20 years teaching experience I question, has it been productive? First off, one should never try to "force" a book to have more information than what it was intended but one must use the information given as productively as possible. The book never said it would be a "how to teach the disadvantaged". It was how to teach literature. what can be gained from the title is to teach literature to literature students. So his foundation must necessarily crumble. If the author had "forseen" jackasses like this well then it would cease to be a compaq book and probably end up being hundreds or thousands of pages long, ranging from how to teach minority students; black, asian, hispanic and then how to teach each indiviudual minority group when such may apply; working, non-working, first generation college student, second generation college student etc... So you see, to "want" something that was not intended and to critique a book for such is plain stupid. I am a English Literature student and I think this book is good. For are you pedantic grammarians who will try to see the faults in my writing, a fart to you!
 Flawed but helpful array of suggestions by many profs January 28, 2006
17 out of 19 found this review helpful
I've only taught 20 years, half that Showalter has in her high-profile and productive career, so I was curious to learn from her. The result's a bit awkward--this book appears to have been the culmination of seminars she gave on how to teach, comments culled from dozens of fellow instructors, and her thoughts on teaching and its relation to theory, the academy, research, and the wider issues that intersect with and make up literary content. The book's only 150 or so pages, and extremely pricy, but it's a sensible addition for a library, if not one's own shelf.
Helpful tips on grading, handling student complaints, becoming more active in teaching rather than lecturing, and accounts of failures and successes and stalemates in the classroom all make this a recommended read for TAs, beginning instructors, and veterans searching for inspiration and innovation. Taking the example of Wilbert McKeachie's insistence on active, student-centered learning (I have the 11th ed. of his "Teaching Tips"), Showalter urges teachers to forget about lecturing and to focus more on learning. Making assessments based on defined objectives may sound like educationalese, but as she admits, students and profs benefit from clear goals, set each day in class as well as for assignments and projects over the term. Too many instructors forget that students are coming to texts and insights for the first, not the forty-first time, and many comments here remind literature teachers to keep this freshness of the beginner's encounter with the reading in mind constantly.
What disappointed me was the sketchy nature of many of the chapters, of uneven length and depth. For instance, that on teaching fiction assumes that novels will be assigned; short stories are not mentioned. The common Intro to Lit course that combines a bit of drama and poetry with stories for those not majoring in English but taking a class as a breadth requirement gains no special attention. The vast majority of those contributing comments to the book also teach at colleges and universities catering to a privileged class, literally, and perhaps rooms full of more eager if not totally enthralled English or at least humanities majors who, for the most part, chose to take these courses for a degree in the liberal arts.
This lack of connection with the wider college experience, in which students are older, more harried by jobs and family and money responsibilities, and those who (as where I teach) are not only non-English majors but often non-English native speakers, or from the families of immigrants, is not considered at all. One comment is given by an MIT teacher, but his students, obviously not English majors, are considerably distant from those, often first-generation, students at the local community college faced with a required course in literature to complete with little or no comprehension of any but the rudimentary background or cultural contexts with which Prof. Showalter's Ivy League students will have most likely been familiar with, and probably enamored with, long before they entered Princeton's hallowed halls.
In one paragraph, the disparity between academic stars, the "frequent flyers" (such as herself I might add) and the rest of us, "academic drones," "freeway flyers" is noted. Otherwise, the present and future conditions under which many of us who have entered academia in far more precarious and more pragmatic decades than Bryn Mawr grad Showalter did, around the JFK administration, are not addressed. This segregation of those who can afford to study literature at leisure and those who have to cram it in among business or technical courses for their major and who are driven to finish school while working perhaps full time is left out of these pages. For all the lip service paid to the underclass--and those who struggle nights or weekends to get a degree so as to leave such limitations--by those from the overclass, these widening gaps get not a glance. What is the future of literature in a profit-driven, bottom-line, and heedlessly philistine culture that only leaves a literature class in many curricula to satisfy accreditation standards? What this book neglects most of all: how to teach literature to the less motivated and/or far less prepared students in many of our unhallowed, non-Ivied, institutions today. This mission that many who teach literature today must face is absent from this book, despite all the attention the tenured ranks and the more richly renumerated academic stars give to race, class, cultural, and political issues through the literature they teach and about which they publish so much.
The rest of us are left out of these chapters, but, despite this neglect, any teacher of literature can be benefit from some pages of this book. It should have been more thoroughly prepared for consistency in the various chapters, and expanded so as to give more solutions than it does list problems. For example, TAs list details of difficulties they face, but Showalter merely copies these, leaving remedies to them only generalized, and not given as particularly tied to the specific cases quoted. Still, for lack of a competing book geared directly to teachers of literature (as opposed to the many aids for composition instructors) an instructor does well by reading this. It's essential to be reminded--even if the prof remains untenured, exploited, and debt-ridden--that what's essential in the classroom, no matter where it may be, is that the student be not only graded but guided. We all need to be nagged that we who teach need to not lecture so often as we must remember to learn--all the more since we stand in front of a room full of prospective learners.
|
|
|
Student Superstore Suppported by International Scholarship Resources and Amazon.Com
| |
